Key Ideas and Theories within Functionalism


Functionalism is a macro-level theoretical perspective in sociology that views society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability.


Functionalism is considered a structural theory because it focuses on the social structures that shape society and influence individual behaviour. It views society as a system of interrelated parts, where each part has a function that contributes to the stability and cohesion of the whole.


In the context of families and households, functionalists examine how family structures and relationships contribute to the maintenance of social order and the functioning of society. By understanding the functions of different social institutions, functionalists aim to explain how society remains stable and orderly.


Within the context of families and households, functionalists focus on the functions that these institutions perform to maintain the social system.

There are SIX key functionalist ideas to learn with relation to their views on families and households.

  1. Primary socialisation
  2. Stabilisation of adult personalities
  3. Reproduction
  4. Economic support
  5. Sexual regulation
  6. Social integration


Primary Socialisation
Functionalists argue that the family is crucial for the primary socialisation of children, teaching them the norms and values of society. This ensures the continuation of cultural and social norms.

Key Theorist: Talcott Parsons emphasized the role of the family in internalising society’s culture and stabilising adult personalities.
 

Stabilisation of Adult Personalities

The family provides emotional support and security to adults, acting as a safe haven from the stresses of the outside world.

Key Theorist: Parsons referred to this as the “warm bath” theory, where the family helps to relieve the pressures of work and society.



 

Reproduction

Families are responsible for producing the next generation, ensuring the continuation of society.

Key Theorist: George Murdock identified reproduction as one of the universal functions of the family.



 

Economic Support


Families provide for the economic needs of their members, such as food, shelter, and clothing.


Key Theorist: Murdock also highlighted the economic function of the family, where members cooperate economically for mutual benefit.
 

Sexual Regulation

Families help to regulate sexual behaviour, providing a stable structure for sexual relations and procreation.

Key Theorist: Murdock identified sexual regulation as another universal function of the family.
 

Social Integration


Families promote social integration by transmitting cultural norms and values across generations.

Key Theorist: Émile Durkheim, although not specifically a family theorist, emphasized the importance of social cohesion and integration through shared norms and values.

 

 



 

Changes in the Functionalist Perspective on Families and Households Over Time


Over time, the functionalist perspective on families and households has evolved, reflecting changes in society. This is seen in three main ways:

  1. Modernity and diversity
  2. Criticism of traditional gender roles
  3. Adaptation to social changes


Modernity and Diversity


In the mid-20th century, functionalists like Talcott Parsons emphasised the nuclear family as the ideal family structure for industrial societies. The nuclear family was seen as functional for society’s needs, such as geographical mobility and a clear division of labour between men and women.


Parsons argued that the isolated nuclear family was best suited for modern industrial society. However, as society has progressed, functionalists like Robert Chester have acknowledged the increasing diversity of family forms, including single-parent families, same-sex families, and cohabiting couples, though they often still view the nuclear family as the most functional.

 

Critique of Traditional Gender Roles


Early functionalist perspectives often reinforced traditional gender roles, with men as breadwinners and women as homemakers. Over time, there has been recognition of more egalitarian family structures and the importance of shared responsibilities.


John Bell and Hilary Friel in their study on the division of labor within families highlighted the shift towards more equal sharing of domestic tasks between men and women.
 

Adaptation to Social Changes


Functionalists have adapted their theories to address changes such as the rise in divorce rates, changes in gender roles, and the impact of globalisation on family structures.


Michael Young and Peter Willmott‘s study “The Symmetrical Family” (1973) showed the movement towards more symmetrical family roles, with a more equal division of labour.

 



 

Application to Modern Family Dynamics


The functionalist perspective can be applied to understand contemporary family dynamics in five ways:

  1. Diverse family forms
  2. Shared responsibilities
  3. Social support networks
  4. Economic challenges
  5. Technology and communication


Diverse Family Forms


Functionalists acknowledge the rise of diverse family forms, such as single-parent families, same-sex families, and cohabiting couples. While the traditional nuclear family is still viewed as functional, modern functionalist perspectives recognize that different family forms can also fulfil essential functions.
 

Shared Responsibilities


The changing roles of men and women in modern families reflect a shift towards more egalitarian structures. Functionalists now consider the importance of shared responsibilities in maintaining family stability and fulfilling economic and emotional functions.
 

Social Support Networks


In contemporary society, families are part of broader social support networks that include extended family members, friends, and community resources. Functionalists see these networks as crucial for providing emotional and practical support.
 

Economic Challenges


Modern families face economic challenges such as job insecurity and housing costs. Functionalists examine how families adapt to these challenges to maintain stability and fulfil their economic functions.
 


Technology and Communication


Advances in technology and communication have transformed family dynamics. Functionalists explore how technology impacts family interactions, socialisation, and the provision of emotional support.



 


Additional Perspectives on the Functionalist View of Families and Households

There are four additional perspectives on the functionalist view of families and households worth considering:

  1. Critical realism
  2. Symbolic interactionism
  3. Exchange theory
  4. Developmental theories

 

Critical Realism


Critical realists argue that while functionalism provides valuable insights into the functions of families, it fails to account for the underlying social structures and mechanisms that shape family life.


Key Theorists
Roy Bhaskar: Known for his work “A Realist Theory of Science” (1975), Bhaskar laid the foundations of Critical Realism.
Margaret Archer: Her book “Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach” (1995) is a significant contribution to Critical Realism.
Study: Archer’s study on “Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory” (1988) explores how cultural factors influence social structures and individual actions.
 
 


Symbolic Interactionism


Symbolic interactionists critique functionalism for its macro-level focus, arguing that it overlooks the micro-level interactions that shape family life.


Key Theorists
George Herbert Mead: His work “Mind, Self, and Society” (1934) is foundational to Symbolic Interactionism.
Herbert Blumer: Expanded on Mead’s ideas and coined the term “Symbolic Interactionism” in his work “Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method” (1969).
Study: Blumer’s study on “Society as Symbolic Interaction” (1969) examines how individuals create and maintain social order through symbolic interactions.

Exchange Theory


Exchange theorists argue that family relationships are based on cost-benefit analyses, where individuals seek to maximise rewards and minimise costs.


Key Theorists
George Homans: Introduced Social Exchange Theory in his work “Social Behaviour as Exchange” (1958).
Peter Blau: Expanded on Homans’ ideas and focused on the role of social exchange in social structures in his work “Exchange and Power in Social Life” (1964).
Study: Thibaut and Kelley’s study on “The Social Psychology of Groups” (1959) explores how individuals evaluate the costs and benefits of social interactions.


Developmental Theories


Developmental theorists highlight the stages of family life and the changes that occur over time.

Key Theorists:
Émile Durkheim: His work “The Division of Labor in Society” (1893) discusses how social structures evolve over time.
Talcott Parsons: His book “The Social System” (1951) examines how societies develop and modernise.
Study: David Apter’s study on “The Politics of Modernisation” (1965) analyses how political systems influence societal development.



 
 
Criticism and Evaluation of the Functionalist Perspective

There are five possible points of evaluation of the functionalist perspective on families and households:

  1. Overemphasis on consensus and stabilioty
  2. Neglect of family diversity
  3. Outdated gender roles
  4. Ignorance of dysfunction – the ‘darker side’ of family life

Overemphasis on Consensus and Stability


Critics argue that functionalism overemphasises the importance of social order and consensus, ignoring conflicts and inequalities within families, such as domestic violence and power imbalances.
Marxist Perspective: Marxists argue that the family serves the interests of capitalism by reproducing labour power and maintaining class inequality. They believe that functionalism overlooks the ways in which the family can contribute to the exploitation and oppression of the working class.

Neglect of Family Diversity


Functionalists have been criticised for their focus on the nuclear family as the ideal type, neglecting the diversity of family forms in contemporary society.
Feminist Perspective: Feminists highlight the diversity of family forms and argue that functionalism reinforces patriarchal norms and values. They critique functionalists for ignoring the experiences of women and other marginalised groups within different family structures.
Deterministic View
Functionalism is seen as deterministic, suggesting that individuals are simply products of social structures and institutions without considering human agency and individuality.
Interactionist Perspective: Interactionists emphasise the importance of individual agency and the subjective experiences of family members. They argue that functionalism fails to consider the dynamic and negotiated nature of family life, where individuals actively create and maintain their relationships.

Outdated Gender Roles


The traditional functionalist perspective reinforces outdated gender roles, failing to account for the increasing number of families with dual earners and the changing roles of men and women in society.
Postmodern Perspective: Postmodernists argue that functionalism’s focus on traditional gender roles is outdated in a society characterised by diversity and fluidity. They highlight the importance of recognising the changing nature of family roles and structures in a postmodern world.

Ignorance of Dysfunction


Functionalists often ignore the dysfunctions within families, such as neglect and abuse, and the negative impacts these can have on individuals and society.
Conflict Perspective: Conflict theorists argue that functionalism’s focus on consensus and harmony overlooks the conflicts and power struggles within families. They believe that families can be sites of inequality and oppression, where members may experience exploitation and violence.